From ca3144b78360b834a70f966ffaa32aaebc5f65a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Rueger <stefan.rueger@urclocks.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 21:53:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Recommend trying -c stk500v1 if stk500v2 fails followed by
 stk500v1 failure

... as it might have been that probing with stk500v2 protocol threw a
stk500v1 firmware off its rails
---
 src/stk500generic.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/stk500generic.c b/src/stk500generic.c
index c0220efe..6cd89d7e 100644
--- a/src/stk500generic.c
+++ b/src/stk500generic.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static int stk500generic_open(PROGRAMMER *pgm, const char *port) {
   if(pgm->teardown)
     pgm->teardown(pgm);
 
-  pmsg_error("cannot open either stk500v1 or stk500v2 programmer\n");
+  pmsg_error("probing stk500v2 failed, as did stk500v1; perhaps try -c stk500v1\n");
   return -1;
 }