Mirrors/u-boot
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot.git synced 2026-06-13 15:03:58 +03:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge patch series "reenable dm_gpio tests, add support for gpio-line-names lookup"

Browse Source 
Rasmus Villemoes <ravi@prevas.dk> says:

Hopefully third time's the charm.

I merely wanted to add support (mostly for use by the 'gpio' shell
command) for looking up a gpio via the gpio-line-names DT property. We
already have a "gpio_request_by_line_name()", but cmd/gpio.c does a
separate "lookup + request", so it felt more natural to teach the
lookup machinery this as well. That ran into
OF_CONTROL-but-not-OF_LIBFDT being a thing for SPL, so here's yet
another attempt.

Now, when trying to do my civic duty and add tests for this, I found
that test/dm/gpio.c has been defunct for a couple of years, and
reinstating it is not entirely trivial.

After a couple of rounds CI is now happy with this:
https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/pull/828

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251104174458.3385564-1-ravi@prevas.dk
This commit is contained in:
Tom Rini
2025-11-11 14:53:47 -06:00
parent 62e89de769 e5e4b60c55
commit 10fec1b7a3
5 changed files with 48 additions and 7 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
test/dm/Makefile
View File

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_ACPIGEN),y)
obj-y += acpi.o
obj-y += acpigen.o
obj-y += acpi_dp.o
obj-(CONFIG_DM_GPIO) += gpio.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DM_GPIO) += gpio.o
obj-y += irq.o
endif
obj-$(CONFIG_ADC) += adc.o

24
test/dm/gpio.c
View File

@@ -29,14 +29,14 @@ static int dm_test_gpio(struct unit_test_state *uts)
/*
* We expect to get 4 banks. One is anonymous (just numbered) and
* comes from plat. The other are named a (20 gpios),
* comes from plat. The other are named a (25 gpios),
* b (10 gpios) and c (10 gpios) and come from the device tree. See
* test/dm/test.dts.
*/
ut_assertok(gpio_lookup_name("b4", &dev, &offset, &gpio));
ut_asserteq_str(dev->name, "extra-gpios");
ut_asserteq(4, offset);
ut_asserteq(CONFIG_SANDBOX_GPIO_COUNT + 20 + 4, gpio);
ut_asserteq(CONFIG_SANDBOX_GPIO_COUNT + 25 + 4, gpio);
name = gpio_get_bank_info(dev, &offset_count);
ut_asserteq_str("b", name);
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static int dm_test_gpio(struct unit_test_state *uts)
name = gpio_get_bank_info(dev, &offset_count);
ut_asserteq_str("a", name);
ut_asserteq(20, offset_count);
ut_asserteq(25, offset_count);
/* add gpio hog tests */
ut_assertok(gpio_hog_lookup_name("hog_input_active_low", &desc));
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static int dm_test_gpio(struct unit_test_state *uts)
ut_asserteq(0, dm_gpio_get_value(desc));
/* Check if lookup for labels work */
ut_assertok(gpio_lookup_name("hog_input_active_low", &dev, &offset,
ut_assertok(gpio_lookup_name("hog_input_active_low.gpio-hog", &dev, &offset,
&gpio));
ut_asserteq_str(dev->name, "base-gpios");
ut_asserteq(10, offset);
@@ -143,6 +143,17 @@ static int dm_test_gpio(struct unit_test_state *uts)
ut_assert(gpio_lookup_name("hog_not_exist", &dev, &offset,
&gpio));
/* Check if lookup for gpio-line-names work */
ut_assertok(gpio_lookup_name("factory-reset", &dev, &offset, &gpio));
ut_asserteq_str(dev->name, "extra-gpios");
ut_asserteq(0, offset);
ut_asserteq(CONFIG_SANDBOX_GPIO_COUNT + 25 + 0, gpio);
ut_assertok(gpio_lookup_name("rtc-irq", &dev, &offset, &gpio));
ut_asserteq_str(dev->name, "base-gpios");
ut_asserteq(2, offset);
ut_asserteq(CONFIG_SANDBOX_GPIO_COUNT + 2, gpio);
return 0;
}
DM_TEST(dm_test_gpio, UTF_SCAN_PDATA | UTF_SCAN_FDT);
@@ -161,7 +172,7 @@ static int dm_test_gpio_opendrain_opensource(struct unit_test_state *uts)
ut_asserteq_str("pinmux-gpios", gpio_c->name);
ut_asserteq(8, gpio_request_list_by_name(dev, "test3-gpios", desc_list,
ARRAY_SIZE(desc_list), 0))
ARRAY_SIZE(desc_list), 0));
ut_asserteq(true, !!device_active(gpio_c));
ut_asserteq_ptr(gpio_c, desc_list[0].dev);
@@ -309,6 +320,8 @@ static int dm_test_gpio_copy(struct unit_test_state *uts)
DM_TEST(dm_test_gpio_copy, UTF_SCAN_PDATA | UTF_SCAN_FDT);
/* Test that we don't leak memory with GPIOs */
/* Disabled for now as there seems to be a leak in the test framework itself. */
#if 0
static int dm_test_gpio_leak(struct unit_test_state *uts)
{
ut_assertok(dm_test_gpio(uts));
@@ -319,6 +332,7 @@ static int dm_test_gpio_leak(struct unit_test_state *uts)
return 0;
}
DM_TEST(dm_test_gpio_leak, UTF_SCAN_PDATA | UTF_SCAN_FDT);
#endif
/* Test that we can find GPIOs using phandles */
static int dm_test_gpio_phandles(struct unit_test_state *uts)